PRODUCTS
Modern video players are no longer just playback shells. They’re expected to handle:
Each of these adds code. And because the streaming landscape is fragmented across devices, browsers, formats, and regions most players ship with fallback logic, feature detection, and polyfills that inflate the bundle.
What feels like an over-engineered player is often the result of trying to make it work everywhere. And one of the biggest sources of that complexity? Streaming protocols
Unlike traditional file-based playback (like .mp4), modern players are built to handle streaming which introduces a whole new layer of complexity.
To support adaptive playback across devices and network conditions, most players today include logic for three major protocols:
HLS is one of the most widely used streaming formats, originally introduced by Apple for iOS devices. Over time, it has become the de facto standard for delivering high-quality video content on the web.
How HLS works:
Challenges with HLS:
DASH is an industry-wide standard developed by MPEG that competes with HLS by offering more flexibility. Unlike HLS, which uses .m3u8 playlists, DASH uses MPD (Media Presentation Description) files, which are XML-based manifest files describing the available media streams.
How DASH works:
Challenges with DASH:
Progressive MP4 (also known as progressive download) is the simplest way to play videos online. Instead of breaking a video into segments, it loads the entire MP4 file as a continuous stream.
How progressive MP4 works:
Challenges with progressive MP4:
Since different devices and browsers have varying levels of support for these protocols, modern playback engines must include compatibility layers that increase their overall size. Here’s why:
Parsing different manifest formats
Handling adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR)
Fetching & buffering media segments
DRM & content protection
Error handling &recovery
.png)
Most popular video players on the web like hls.js, dash.js, and Shaka Player are built to handle all the complexity we’ve talked about: different streaming formats, quality levels, network conditions, and browser quirks.
They work well out of the box. But big platforms like Netflix, YouTube, and Twitch don’t use them.
Instead, they build their own video engines. Why? Because they only include what they actually need. Nothing extra. That makes their players faster, lighter, and more reliable for their specific use case.
FastPix Player takes a similar customizable approach. It gives you the building blocks to include only the features and protocols you actually use so you get the flexibility of a general-purpose player without the extra weight. If you want to build something closer to a purpose-built engine, you can.
Here’s what a typical general-purpose player does:
That’s a lot of logic and it adds up. These players have to be ready for everything, even if your app only needs one format.
Netflix doesn’t need HLS fallback in Safari or progressive MP4 in Android. But unless you build your own player or have a customizable player like FastPix you might be shipping all of that.
So it’s worth asking:
Are you shipping a video player built for edge cases you’ll never run into?
That’s one of the biggest reasons modern playback engines are bigger than expected.
Modern video players have to juggle more than just formats they’re expected to decode, buffer, and protect video streams across a fragmented ecosystem. That means:
That’s a lot of work and it shows up in your bundle size.
Even when technologies like WebAssembly offer performance boosts, there’s a tradeoff: debugging gets harder, and shipping cross-browser-safe modules can backfire. Similarly, cloud-based ABR might simplify local logic, but you’ll likely pay for it in latency or edge reliability.
Twitch and YouTube are two high-scale platforms that took control by building their own engines, using CMAF to streamline delivery across HLS and DASH but that’s not an option for most teams.
So yes, playback engines can be smaller. But they often aren’t not because of bad engineering, but because they’re doing more than ever before.
ABR isn’t optional anymore not when your viewers switch from Wi-Fi to 3G in the same session. But here’s the tradeoff: seamless playback comes with complex logic.
Modern ABR implementations require:
Each of these demands real-time feedback loops baked into the player. It’s like having a tiny network analyst running in the background of your playback engine useful, but expensive.
Supporting every screen sounds good in theory. In reality, it means building for:
All of this adds up. In fact, polyfills and compatibility layers alone can eat up 20% or more of your player’s total size.
Fallback mechanisms? Handy when they work, but also mean you’re shipping multiple playback strategies in one build. And WASM can bridge performance gaps, but it comes at a size and debugging cost.
Standard players buffer ahead. That’s what gives them stability. But in live use cases gaming, auctions, sports betting buffering is the enemy. You’re not just reducing delay, you’re rewriting how playback even works.
Low-latency protocols like LL-HLS or CMAF require:
This isn’t a simple toggle it’s a redesign. You’re shipping more logic to compensate for less margin.
Players are now products in their own right. That means rich controls, visual polish, accessibility features, and brand theming.
But here’s the catch: every button, toggle, and keyboard shortcut is another weight in the payload. Modern controls alone can add 200KB+.
Think about:
Not all of it is necessary especially if your use case is embedded playback or silent autoplay in feed.
No one brags about their retry logic. But when a segment fails or a buffer drains, the user blames the player not the network.
That’s why modern players include:
On top of that, product teams want QoE metrics: rebuffering rates, bitrate switches, watch time, interaction events. And if you’re debugging at scale, you want all of it in real time.
But here’s the rub: analytics is heavy. The more you track, the more you weigh.
Yes if you’re intentional.
But there’s a catch: modular players are like IKEA sets remove the wrong piece, and the rest might not hold up.
Video players today do more than just play video. They support:
FastPix gives you options. Our video player is built to be flexible with customizable settings for ABR, captions, analytics, error handling, and playback UI. Whether you’re building a lightweight embed or a high-performance live app, you decide what’s included.
Explore our video player docs and guides, or reach out to our team if you’d like to talk through your setup.
ABR in HLS is typically driven by Apple's native player logic on Safari, offering limited customization but smoother integration. In contrast, DASH gives developers granular control over ABR algorithms including switching thresholds and segment prefetching but requires deeper implementation. This flexibility in DASH often leads to heavier player logic and increased complexity, especially when custom quality ladders and codecs are involved.
HLS and DASH use fundamentally different manifest formats .m3u8 for HLS and XML-based .mpd for DASH. HLS manifests are text-based and simpler to parse, whereas DASH manifests are hierarchical and support a wider set of configurations like multi-period streams, multiple audio languages, and codec switching. Supporting both formats in the same player means bundling two distinct parsing systems, significantly increasing code size and processing overhead.
Fallback logic allows video players to recover gracefully when a preferred streaming protocol or codec isn’t supported on a device. But every fallback adds overhead: you ship extra code paths for conditions that may never trigger. This includes unused DRM systems, alternate rendering paths, and polyfilled browser APIs. While essential for cross-device reliability, this often bloats the player bundle and complicates debugging and testing.
Even if you only use progressive MP4 playback, many general-purpose players bundle logic for HLS and DASH by default along with fallback support, manifest parsers, adaptive streaming, and DRM. Unless your player is customizable or purpose-built, you're likely including unnecessary features that inflate your JS bundle, even if they’re never used in your app.
Modern video players need to support multiple DRM systems like FairPlay (Apple), Widevine (Google), and PlayReady (Microsoft), each with its own encryption, licensing, and playback quirks. This can easily bloat the player and slow down load times. To avoid that, most players optimize by detecting the user’s platform and loading only the necessary DRM logic, instead of bundling everything upfront. They also use dynamic license acquisition—fetching keys only when needed—and modularize their DRM code to keep the core player lightweight. This way, playback remains secure without compromising performance or startup time.
.png)
.png)
